Background: In many countries, concerns have arisen over the population using antibiotics without consulting a physician. This practice can place patients at risk and increase antibiotic resistance in the community. Objective: To evaluate individuals' preferences regarding the use of antibiotics. The study also assessed the likely effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate use of antibiotics. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. The attributes were determined by a systematic literature review and four focus group sessions. The DCE included nine factors – cost, time to get attention, level of symptoms, efficacy, safety, among others- and one label -using or not antibiotics. Data analysis was carried out using a generalized multinomial logit (GMNL) model. Marginal probabilities of different sets of attributes' levels were compared to estimate the likely effectiveness of interventions. Results: The survey was administered to 222 participants from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. The results suggest that participants preferred not taking antibiotics and having a physician as an advisor, but the probability of inappropriate antibiotic use increased as the waiting time or the cost of receiving advice rose. The pharmacy was the preferred source of antibiotics, and participants chose the pharmacy worker (nonprofessional) as an advisor over the nurse on the phone. In the absence of any interventions aimed at reducing the use of antibiotics, approximately 47.3% of people would misuse antibiotics. This reduces to 26.5% when people perceive the efficacy of the antibiotics as low and the potential risks of self-medicating as high. An alternative model using a nursing service would likely lower inappropriate use of antibiotics. Conclusions: Even though people prefer not using antibiotics or visiting a physician in case of disease rather than self-medicating, current access conditions might discourage them from appropriately use antibiotics. The results suggest that interventions that informing people about the risks of self-medication and the low efficacy might significantly reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics. Our results also suggest that programs that empower other health professionals to provide access to antibiotics would likely further lower inappropriate use.

Abstract Objective: The use of antibiotics without prescription is common in Colombia as well as in other developing countries. The objective of this study is to explore the attitudes and motivations associated with the use of antibiotics without prescription. Methods: Focus group sessions were held with residents of Bogotá. Different socioeconomic groups were approached to identify possible differences of opinion. A semi-structured interview guide was used to guide the discussion, with thematic analysis used to identify central themes. Results: In total, 21 people, aged between 25 and 50 years participated in four focus groups. The results suggest that the use of antibiotics without prescription is common practice. The main reasons included barriers to access to prescribed medications due to limited health insurance. Even those with adequate access to health insurance report being willing to use a treatment without a prescription if they have confidence in its effectiveness. The relationship with the physician is important, but pharmacy storekeepers are also highly trusted. While some participants understood that antibiotics can cure infections but cause serious adverse events, several misconceptions about antibiotics therapy were identified. These included a lack of knowledge of resistance transmissibility among communities. Conclusions: The results have implications for interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate use of antibiotics, highlighting i) how lack of access to timely care creates an incentive to self-prescribe, ii) the key role that pharmacy storekeepers play in the Colombian healthcare system and the need to include them in interventions, and iii) the misconceptions about inappropriate use of medications that need to be addressed by educational programs. These findings provide insights to other countries where antibiotics misuse is also a problem.

Objetivo Comparar las tasas de mortalidad por cáncer de cuello uterino en los departamentos de Colombia, tanto en las zonas urbanas como en las zonas rurales y examinar las posibles causas de las diferencias. Métodos Este fue un estudio ecológico. La mortalidad causada por cáncer de cuello uterino fue estimada a partir de los datos recolectados entre los años2005 y 2008 por el Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).La mortalidad global en Colombia, la mortalidad por departamento y la mortalidad por zonas rurales y urbanas fueron incluidas en estas cifras. El DANE proporcionó el indicador del sub registro de la mortalidad por departamentos y el índice de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas (NBI). El coeficiente de correlación de Spearman fue estimada por mortalidad promedio por departamento, NBI y las variables de sub registro. Resultados La tasa anual de mortalidad global desde el año 2005 hasta el año 2008, causado por cáncer de cuello uterino en Colombia, osciló entre 10 hasta 11,1 por 100.000 mujeres. La mortalidad registrada en las zonas urbanos tenía una tasa más alta que en los zonas rurales (10.3-11.7 cf 7.6-8.7). La tasa más baja de mortalidad promedio fue registrada en el departamento de Chocó (4.7) y la más alta del departamento de Meta (18.2). Se encontró una correlación inversa entre la mortalidad promedio por departamento y las NBI. El indicador del sub registro tenía una correlación inversa con la mortalidad, significando que los departamentos que tienen problemas relacionadas con el registro también registraron tasas más bajas de mortalidad. Conclusiones Los sistemas de salud deben adoptar estrategias encaminadas a mejorar los sistemas de información para apoyar a la toma de decisiones y optimizar el uso de los recursos sanitarios, particularmente para las poblaciones vulnerables y las poblaciones con necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Al comparar la mortalidad entre los departamentos y las zonas no conducirá a conclusiones confiables en tales condiciones de registro.

Objective Comparing cervical cancer mortality rates in Colombian departments, as well as in urban and rural areas and examining the potential causes of any differences. Methodology This was an ecologic study. Mortality due to cervical cancer was estimated from data collected between 2005 and 2008 by the Colombian National Statistics Bureau (DANE).This included overall mortality in Colombia, mortality by department and mortality by rural and urban area. DANE provided theunder-recording indicator for mortality by departments and the unmet basic needs index. Spearman correlation coefficient was estimated for average mortality by department, unmet basic needs and under-recording variables. Results The overall annual mortality rate from 2005 to 2008 due to cervical cancer in Colombia ranged from 10 to 11.1 per 100,000 females. Mortality reported in urban areas was higher than in rural areas (10.3-11.7 cf 7.6-8.7). The lowest average mortality was reported from the Chocó department (4.7) and the highest from Meta (18.2). An inverse correlation was found between average mortality by department and unmet basic needs. The ‘under-reporting' indicator had an inverse correlation with mortality, meaning that departments having recording issues also reported lower mortality rates. Conclusions Health systems must adopt strategies designed to improve information systems for supporting decision-making and optimise the use of health resources, particularly for vulnerable populations and populations having unmet basic needs. Comparing mortality amongst departments and areas will not lead to reliable conclusions in such under-recording conditions.

Objective Comparing cervical cancer mortality rates in Colombian departments, as well as in urban and rural areas and examining the potential causes of any differences. Methodology This was an ecologic study. Mortality due to cervical cancer was estimated from data collected between 2005 and 2008 by the Colombian National Statistics Bureau (DANE).This included overall mortality in Colombia, mortality by department and mortality by rural and urban area. DANE provided theunder-recording indicator for mortality by departments and the unmet basic needs index. Spearman correlation coefficient was estimated for average mortality by department, unmet basic needs and under-recording variables. Results The overall annual mortality rate from 2005 to 2008 due to cervical cancer in Colombia ranged from 10 to 11.1 per 100,000 females. Mortality reported in urban areas was higher than in rural areas (10.3-11.7 cf 7.6-8.7). The lowest average mortality was reported from the Chocó department (4.7) and the highest from Meta (18.2). An inverse correlation was found between average mortality by department and unmet basic needs. The ‘under-reporting' indicator had an inverse correlation with mortality, meaning that departments having recording issues also reported lower mortality rates. Conclusions Health systems must adopt strategies designed to improve information systems for supporting decision-making and optimise the use of health resources, particularly for vulnerable populations and populations having unmet basic needs. Comparing mortality amongst departments and areas will not lead to reliable conclusions in such under-recording conditions.

Objetivo Comparar las tasas de mortalidad por cáncer de cuello uterino en los departamentos de Colombia, tanto en las zonas urbanas como en las zonas rurales y examinar las posibles causas de las diferencias. Métodos Este fue un estudio ecológico. La mortalidad causada por cáncer de cuello uterino fue estimada a partir de los datos recolectados entre los años2005 y 2008 por el Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).La mortalidad global en Colombia, la mortalidad por departamento y la mortalidad por zonas rurales y urbanas fueron incluidas en estas cifras. El DANE proporcionó el indicador del sub registro de la mortalidad por departamentos y el índice de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas (NBI). El coeficiente de correlación de Spearman fue estimada por mortalidad promedio por departamento, NBI y las variables de sub registro. Resultados La tasa anual de mortalidad global desde el año 2005 hasta el año 2008, causado por cáncer de cuello uterino en Colombia, osciló entre 10 hasta 11,1 por 100.000 mujeres. La mortalidad registrada en las zonas urbanos tenía una tasa más alta que en los zonas rurales (10.3-11.7 cf 7.6-8.7). La tasa más baja de mortalidad promedio fue registrada en el departamento de Chocó (4.7) y la más alta del departamento de Meta (18.2). Se encontró una correlación inversa entre la mortalidad promedio por departamento y las NBI. El indicador del sub registro tenía una correlación inversa con la mortalidad, significando que los departamentos que tienen problemas relacionadas con el registro también registraron tasas más bajas de mortalidad. Conclusiones Los sistemas de salud deben adoptar estrategias encaminadas a mejorar los sistemas de información para apoyar a la toma de decisiones y optimizar el uso de los recursos sanitarios, particularmente para las poblaciones vulnerables y las poblaciones con necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Al comparar la mortalidad entre los departamentos y las zonas no conducirá a conclusiones confiables en tales condiciones de registro.

Objetivo: explicar los conceptos propios de las evaluaciones económicas mediante el análisis crítico de un estudio tipo costo-efectividad. Materiales y métodos: con base en una pregunta clínica se hace una búsqueda en la base de datos Medline vía PubMed. Se selecciona un estudio que aborda el problema de la costo-efectividad en la ginecología. Se exponen los elementos que debe tener en cuenta el lector, los cuales se explican por medio de ejemplos de estudios de evaluación económica en ginecología ya publicados; y se hace el análisis crítico de estos aspectos en la publicación seleccionada. Resultados: para la lectura crítica de un estudio de costo-efectividad es necesario evaluar los siguientes elementos: clara definición de las alternativas a comparar, estimación de los costos incurridos en cada una, evaluación de su efectividad, estimación de la relación costo-efectividad y análisis de sensibilidad. La comprensión de los anteriores elementos permitirá realizar una evaluación profunda de estos estudios. Conclusiones: los análisis económicos merecen consideración por parte de los profesionales de la salud, pues conducen a la toma de decisiones eficientes en el tratamiento de los pacientes.

Objectives: explaining concepts related to economic evaluation in healthcare by using a critical cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) study. Materials and methods: a search was made of the Medline database via PubMed based on a clinical question. A study was selected which approached the matter in hand. The elements which a reader should bear in mind were set out; they were explained by means of examples from already published economic evaluation in healthcare studies regarding gynecology and a critical analysis was made of these aspects in the selected publication. Results: the following elements must be taken into account for a critical reading of a CEA study: the alternatives for making comparisons, cost determination, effectiveness, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and a sensitivity analysis. Understanding these elements will lead to a much deeper evaluation of such studies. Conclusions: economic evaluation deserves to be considered by healthcare professionals as this leads to efficient decisions being taken when treating patients.